Skip to main content
Norwood, Johannesburg · Established 1993
Call

Remote meetings: a video link does not replace the notice, quorum or voting rules

Originally published By Hugh Raichlin AttorneysUpdated

Edited and expanded by Hugh Raichlin Attorneys

Originally published by Law DotNews (“Directors, Trustees: Can You Hold Your AGMs and General Meetings on Zoom?”). © LawDotNews for the original source material. Substantive HRA editorial adaptation; original source credit retained.

A remote meeting can make participation easier for shareholders, scheme owners or trustees. It does not remove the rules governing who may attend, how notice is given, when a quorum exists or how a resolution is passed. A convenient platform and a valid decision are separate questions.

Hugh Raichlin Attorneys can assist with suitable company, trust and community-scheme governance matters. Before sending the link, identify the legal entity and the particular decision. The rules for a company shareholder meeting should not be copied into a family trust or homeowners’ association without checking their governing documents.

Identify which meeting you are holding

Shareholders, directors, body-corporate members, scheme trustees and trust trustees do not exercise the same powers. An annual general meeting may also have requirements that differ from a board meeting or another general meeting.

Collect the current memorandum of incorporation, constitution, registered scheme rules or trust deed, as applicable. Check the relevant statutory rules alongside those documents. The fact that the same individuals usually attend several meetings does not make their different legal capacities interchangeable.

Technology must support real participation

The source article explained that electronic participation involves more than broadcasting a presentation. In the settings it discussed, participants need a workable opportunity to communicate and participate in the decision process. A silent livestream with no meaningful ability to contribute may not serve the same function as an interactive meeting.

Give clear access instructions and consider practical connection limitations. Explain how participants identify themselves, raise questions, view documents and vote. A participant’s temporary disconnection can matter if it affects quorum or an important vote; it should not simply disappear from the minutes.

Keep the ordinary formalities

  • Confirm who may call the meeting and the required notice period.
  • State the business and supply the documents needed for the decision.
  • Check attendance, proxies and the capacity in which each person participates.
  • Establish quorum and record material changes during the meeting.
  • Apply the correct voting threshold to each resolution.
  • Record the wording passed, the result and any required follow-up filing or authorisation.

A chat message saying “agreed” is not a reliable substitute for these steps where the rules require more. Nor should the chair assume that everyone who logged in remained present throughout.

Written resolutions are a different process

Circulating a resolution for written approval may be available in some circumstances. It is not simply a remote meeting without cameras. Check whether that route is permitted for this body and this decision, who must receive it, what threshold applies and how approval is recorded.

Certain business may need to be dealt with at the required meeting rather than moved into an informal email vote. Establish the route before collecting signatures, rather than trying to reconstruct a valid procedure after a dispute develops.

Record enough, but manage privacy

Keep attendance, notices, supplied documents, minutes and voting records. Recording the whole meeting may be useful in some settings, but it introduces separate issues about notice, personal information, confidentiality, access and retention. A recording should not be distributed indiscriminately simply because the meeting occurred online.

Where a decision is challenged, preserve the complete record and obtain advice before implementing an irreversible transaction or retrospectively changing the minutes.

Can we agree informally to ignore the rules for convenience?

Do not assume unanimous convenience cures every requirement or defect. Identify which rules are mandatory and which can lawfully be varied.

Does a technical failure invalidate everything?

Not automatically. Its effect on participation, quorum, voting and fairness must be assessed against the relevant rules and facts.

Prepare the decision, not only the invitation

HRA can review the governing documents, proposed procedure and resolution, or assess a challenge to a completed meeting. Early advice can identify avoidable defects before they become a dispute about authority to act.

Related legal assistance

General information, not legal advice on a particular matter. The documents, facts and applicable law determine the appropriate next step.

Official sources

Related legal services

Discuss your business matter

This article provides general information and is not a substitute for advice on your circumstances.

Published by Hugh Raichlin Attorneys.Legally reviewed by Hugh Raichlin (Principal Attorney & Accredited Mediator).