Skip to main content
Norwood, Johannesburg · Established 1993
Call
Hugh Raichlin Attorneys · Norwood, Johannesburg

Executor Removal & Deceased Estate Disputes in Johannesburg

When estate administration has stalled, information is being withheld or estate assets appear at risk, a clear assessment of the documents matters. Hugh Raichlin Attorneys advises beneficiaries, executors and co-executors in Johannesburg on disputed administration, possible protective steps and applications concerning an executor's continued appointment.

The initial telephone discussion is free and helps us understand whether the firm can assist. A paid consultation is arranged where appropriate. We aim to follow up within one working day after receiving your enquiry.

Hugh Raichlin, attorney at Hugh Raichlin Attorneys

This page is for you if…

  • You cannot obtain a clear explanation of the estate's progress or accounts.
  • Co-executors are deadlocked and administration is being affected.
  • You are concerned that estate assets or funds are being used without proper authority.
  • You have received an application concerning your conduct or appointment as executor.
  • You need advice before seeking removal, responding to an allegation or agreeing to a replacement.

How Hugh Raichlin Attorneys can help

Establish the facts and your role

We review the will, appointment documents, chronology, correspondence and available accounts. An executor, co-executor and beneficiary may have different responsibilities and routes for obtaining information or relief. Identifying who may act, and on whose behalf, is an important first step.

Separate delay from risk to administration

Not every delay or family disagreement justifies removal. We examine what has actually happened, what records support the concern and how the estate's proper administration may be affected. A request for information, an accounting issue, a complaint to the Master and court proceedings serve different purposes.

Assess proportionate next steps

Depending on the evidence and the legal requirements, instructions may involve correspondence, engagement with the Master, an agreed change in administration, protective relief or a court application. Removal is not an automatic result of an allegation, and a complaint does not itself transfer the executor's powers to someone else.

Resolve the connected practical issues

An estate dispute may also concern possession of property, access to records, a disputed transaction or an account. The firm can coordinate litigation and estate-administration advice so that the proposed solution addresses the actual obstacles rather than only the immediate disagreement.

Key considerations

The estate's interests come first

Section 54 of the Administration of Estates Act provides for removal in specified circumstances. The court's assessment is not simply which family member it prefers. The conduct, evidence and effect on proper administration matter. An executor cannot be removed merely because a beneficiary disagrees with a decision.

Do not take over estate assets yourself

Preserve records you may lawfully access. Do not use the deceased's credentials, redirect estate money or distribute assets in an attempt to solve the problem informally. Obtain advice on the authority required for any step.

Identify the correct issue

A disagreement about the validity of a will, an objection to an account and an executor-removal application are not interchangeable. Explain the result you need so the attorney can assess the appropriate route.

Costs and timing depend on the work

The documents, disputed facts, urgency and court process affect scope and cost. A previous judgment does not establish who will pay the costs in another dispute. Fees and the proposed work should be agreed after assessment.

Clarify the issue before choosing the route

Missing information

Identify what was requested, from whom and what response was received.

Administration deadlock

Record which decisions or steps are being prevented.

Asset or accounting concern

Identify the transaction, record or asset causing concern.

Appointment dispute

Obtain the appointment papers and any application or order.

These are different concerns, not a sequence or a decision that removal is justified.

The next steps

  1. 1Send a short outline of your role, the concern and any deadline.
  2. 2Make the relevant appointment papers and correspondence available when requested.
  3. 3Discuss the evidence, possible routes and scope of a paid consultation where appropriate.
  4. 4Give instructions for the agreed next step once authority, conflicts and fees have been addressed.

Information to prepare

You do not need every document before enquiring. Keep the following available where possible and use the requested channel for sensitive records.

  • The will, codicils and letters of executorship or other appointment documents.
  • The estate reference and contact details of the executor or co-executors.
  • A chronology of requests, responses, transactions and missing steps.
  • Accounts, inventories and correspondence you may lawfully access.
  • Any court papers, orders or Master's correspondence.
  • The practical outcome you want and any immediate concern about assets.

Common mistakes to avoid

Avoid relying on accusation alone, confusing a personal disagreement with evidence of administrative risk, taking control without authority or assuming an enquiry suspends a deadline.

Relevant experience for your matter

HRA acted for the successful applicants in Shorkend N.O. and Others v Setton N.O. and Others. The court ordered the removal of an executor, appointment of an independent senior legal practitioner and restoration of specified estate assets. The connected application for leave to appeal was refused in February 2026. The supplied judgments illustrate the importance of evidence and the estate's interests; they do not predict the result of another application.

Hugh Raichlin, attorney at Hugh Raichlin Attorneys

Hugh Raichlin

Principal Attorney & Accredited Mediator

BA, LLB · University of the Witwatersrand

Litigation experience in deceased-estate disputes, including executor-removal proceedings.

View Hugh's profile
Jessica El-Hage, attorney at Hugh Raichlin Attorneys

Jessica El-Hage

Attorney

LLB · University of Johannesburg

Deceased-estate reporting, administration and trust-related matters.

View Jessica's profile

Frequently asked questions

Can a beneficiary remove an executor directly?

A beneficiary cannot simply replace an appointed executor. The appropriate legal route, evidence and appointment arrangements must be assessed.

Is a poor relationship enough for removal?

Not by itself. The relevant question includes whether the conduct or breakdown affects proper administration of the estate. The documents and facts must support the relief sought.

Must I seek removal to obtain information?

Not necessarily. A request for records, an accounting issue or engagement with the Master may need a different response. Explain the information sought and what has already been requested.

Can you assist a co-executor who is unable to progress the estate?

Yes, subject to the firm's assessment and conflict checks. Bring the appointment documents and a clear account of the decisions or steps that are blocked.

Does a previous successful case mean my executor will be removed?

No. Each estate and application depends on its own evidence and legal requirements.

What should I do if papers contain a deadline?

Mention it immediately and seek advice promptly. An enquiry does not extend the deadline or confirm that HRA has accepted instructions.

Related services

Legal Insights

Useful sources

Get clear advice on the next step for the estate

Tell us your role, what is preventing progress and whether any papers or deadline are involved. We will assess whether the firm may assist and arrange the appropriate discussion.

How to get started

  1. 1

    Send a brief enquiry, or start an AI-assisted WhatsApp enquiry at any time.

  2. 2

    The initial telephone discussion is free and helps the firm assess whether it can assist. Where the firm may be able to help, an attorney ordinarily follows up within one working day.

  3. 3

    Where appropriate, a paid consultation is arranged. Its scope and fees are confirmed separately; consultations are usually in person, with remote arrangements considered where suitable.

WhatsApp AI gathers initial information; it does not provide legal advice. An enquiry does not confirm an appointment, acceptance of a matter or action on a deadline.

This website provides general information, not legal advice. Sending an enquiry does not by itself create an attorney-client relationship. Each matter is assessed on its own facts.